Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼öÁ÷ Ä¡Á¶°ñ ½ÅÀå¼ú ÈÄ Áõ´ëµÈ Ä¡Á¶°ñ°ú ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ¿¹ÈÄ Æò°¡

Evaluation of augmented alveolar bone with vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant installation

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 37±Ç 5È£ p.421 ~ 428
Uttom Kumar Shet, ±¹¹Î¼®, Á¤½Â°ï, ¿ÀÈñ±Õ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Uttom Kumar Shet ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±¹¹Î¼® ( Kook Min-Suk ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤½Â°ï ( Jung Seung-Gon ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¿ÀÈñ±Õ ( Oh Hee-Kyun ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Introduction:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical result of vertical alveolar distraction, especially the distracted alveolar bone and installed implants.

Materials and Methods : Twenty-one patients who have been received the vertical alveolar distraction and implant installation on 22 areas (3 maxilla and 19 mandible) using intraoral alveolar distraction device were examined. After consolidation period of 3-4 months, distraction devices were removed and 91 implants were installed in the distracted alveolar bone. The distracted bone and implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically.

Results:Mean height of distracted alveolar bone was 7.5¡¾3.2 mm (range: 2.5-15.0 mm). Mean follow-up period after completion of the distraction was 3.1 years (range: 1.4-11.5 years). Mean resorption of distracted alveolar bone was 1.6¡¾1.8 mm. The success and survival rates of implants was 95.3% and 100%, respectively..

Conclusion:Results of this study indicate that vertical alveolar distraction procedure is a useful and stable method for alveolar ridge augmentation and implantation.

Å°¿öµå

Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery; Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods; Dental Implants; Osteogenesis; Distraction/instrumentation; Osteogenesis; Distraction/methods

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed